|
Dictionary
& search
M-W,
AlltheWeb, Google, Webopedia
Networks & subnets
Subnet
mask calculators & table
Special character codes
Selected ISO 8859-1 codes
Web colours
Are
you limited to 216?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
|
 |
In this table you will find the traditional 216 web safe colours.
You usually get them presented in 6×6×6 cubes, but here
I have roughly arranged the colours from saturated to less saturated,
as I have found that this is what I most often need.
But is one actually still limited to designing with only 216 available
colours? Read my comments about web safe colours
below...
|
000000
|
000033
|
000066
|
000099
|
0000CC
|
0000FF
|
|
330000
|
330033
|
330066
|
330099
|
3300CC
|
3300FF
|
|
660000
|
660033
|
660066
|
660099
|
6600CC
|
6600FF
|
|
990000
|
990033
|
990066
|
990099
|
9900CC
|
9900FF
|
|
CC0000
|
CC0033
|
CC0066
|
CC0099
|
CC00CC
|
CC00FF
|
|
FF0000
|
FF0033
|
FF0066
|
FF0099
|
FF00CC
|
FF00FF
|
|
FF3300
|
FF3333
|
FF3366
|
FF3399
|
FF33CC
|
FF33FF
|
|
FF6600
|
FF6633
|
FF6666
|
FF6699
|
FF66CC
|
FF66FF
|
|
FF9900
|
FF9933
|
FF9966
|
FF9999
|
FF99CC
|
FF99FF
|
|
FFCC00
|
FFCC33
|
FFCC66
|
FFCC99
|
FFCCCC
|
FFCCFF
|
|
FFFF00
|
FFFF33
|
FFFF66
|
FFFF99
|
FFFFCC
|
FFFFFF
|
|
CCFF00
|
CCFF33
|
CCFF66
|
CCFF99
|
CCFFCC
|
CCFFFF
|
|
99FF00
|
99FF33
|
99FF66
|
99FF99
|
99FFCC
|
99FFFF
|
|
66FF00
|
66FF33
|
66FF66
|
66FF99
|
66FFCC
|
66FFFF
|
|
33FF00
|
33FF33
|
33FF66
|
33FF99
|
33FFCC
|
33FFFF
|
|
00FF00
|
00FF33
|
00FF66
|
00FF99
|
00FFCC
|
00FFFF
|
|
00CC00
|
00CC33
|
00CC66
|
00CC99
|
00CCCC
|
00CCFF
|
|
009900
|
009933
|
009966
|
009999
|
0099CC
|
0099FF
|
|
006600
|
006633
|
006666
|
006699
|
0066CC
|
0066FF
|
|
003300
|
003333
|
003366
|
003399
|
0033CC
|
0033FF
|
|
333300
|
333333
|
333366
|
333399
|
3333CC
|
3333FF
|
|
663300
|
663333
|
663366
|
663399
|
6633CC
|
6633FF
|
|
993300
|
993333
|
993366
|
993399
|
9933CC
|
9933FF
|
|
996600
|
996633
|
996666
|
996699
|
9966CC
|
9966FF
|
|
CC3300
|
CC3333
|
CC3366
|
CC3399
|
CC33CC
|
CC33FF
|
|
CC6600
|
CC6633
|
CC6666
|
CC6699
|
CC66CC
|
CC66FF
|
|
CC9900
|
CC9933
|
CC9966
|
CC9999
|
CC99CC
|
CC99FF
|
|
CCCC00
|
CCCC33
|
CCCC66
|
CCCC99
|
CCCCCC
|
CCCCFF
|
|
99CC00
|
99CC33
|
99CC66
|
99CC99
|
99CCCC
|
99CCFF
|
|
66CC00
|
66CC33
|
66CC66
|
66CC99
|
66CCCC
|
66CCFF
|
|
33CC00
|
33CC33
|
33CC66
|
33CC99
|
33CCCC
|
33CCFF
|
|
339900
|
339933
|
339966
|
339999
|
3399CC
|
3399FF
|
|
336600
|
336633
|
336666
|
336699
|
3366CC
|
3366FF
|
|
666600
|
666633
|
666666
|
666699
|
6666CC
|
6666FF
|
|
669900
|
669933
|
669966
|
669999
|
6699CC
|
6699FF
|
|
999900
|
999933
|
999966
|
999999
|
9999CC
|
9999FF
|
The
above colours are listed with hex values. The hex value placement
is red-green-blue:

This
table shows colour conversion:
|
Hex
|
%
|
Decimal
|
|
00
|
0
|
0
|
|
33
|
20
|
51
|
|
66
|
40
|
102
|
|
99
|
60
|
153
|
|
CC
|
80
|
204
|
|
FF
|
100
|
256
|
The
above example, FF3399, thus consists of 100% red, 20% green and
60% blue, which gives a dark pinkish colour like this: 
Colour
display is quite a complex issue, with different gammas and what
have you.
On a more mundane level, here´s a piece of advice for users
of TFT screens: On some older or cheaper TFT screens certain colours
have a tendency to fool you; notably CCCCFF, which can look grey
like CCCCCC, but really gets a purple shade due to its 100% blue
(the FF in CCCCFF). If you are using a TFT screen right now, try
looking at the two boxes below from different angles:
Should
you require another presentation of the web safe colour palette,
I recommend:
| |
Colour
Clicker
A Java version of the 6×6×6 web safe colour cube,
created by Victor Engel. Click a colour, and you get hex,
decimal and percentage values as well as a tag for cutting
and pasting.
Even though it dates back to around 1997 this is still good
stuff, and I have used it quite frequently for a number of
years.
|

Is
one limited to using web safe colours?
No, I don´t believe one is ... anymore. Because how often
are web pages viewed on 8-bit (256 colour) screens these days? My
statistics package for this site says never as far as
these pages are concerned.
Of
course it all depends on which audience you are designing for, but
if your audience uses just relatively current computers, I see little
reason for sticking with the traditional 216 colours (only 216,
as 40 of the 256 available 8-bit colours were omitted in order to
make the colours safe for cross-platform PC/Mac use). Which is fine,
for the web safe palette seriously lacks tints.
However,
if you are designing for handhelds, mobile phones, etc. the situation
may be different, as some of these devices still have pretty few
colours to play with. Again, the more you know about your audience´s
equipment (and how they use it), the better decisions you are able
to make.

|